01
Model the environment
Build a 3D model of the site and assess clutter, electromagnetic background, weather and the approach lanes.
System design
A layered defense system for fixed critical sites.
The design starts with the site and the airspace above it, then selects the sensors and effectors that perform best in each altitude band. The result is one command loop from 5 km out to 400 m under the canopy.
Key figures
5 kmDetection and RF jamming
3 kmDrone-on-drone interception
2 kmLaser jamming
1.5 kmLaser kill
Live simulation
Air picture
Detection · jamming · interception
Design starts with the airspace, not the equipment.
Urban and industrial sites combine heavy electromagnetic interference, clutter and complex weather. No single sensor provides full-dimensional awareness, so the airspace is modelled, zoned and then equipped.
02
Zone the airspace
Divide the airspace above the building line, below it and under the canopy according to threat behaviour and sensor performance.
03
Select the layer
Combine radar, EO, RF and effectors so each zone is covered by the sensor and response that perform best there.
One platform, many positions.
The command platform fuses the sensors and assigns the response. Each position runs its own edge node, so detection and engagement continue if the network link is lost.
Intelligent management and control platformMulti-source fusion · 3D air picture · early warning · decision support
Above-building-line position
Surveillance radar · EO tracker · RF detection
Directional RF jammer · laser interception
Edge computing node · Preset policies · autonomous execution
Below-building-line position
EO tracker · EO search
Detection-and-jamming units
Edge computing node · Preset policies · autonomous execution
Under-canopy position
Distributed EO mesh
Networked jamming · preset policies
Edge computing node · Preset policies · autonomous execution
External systemsCivil aviation · national security · emergency management · police low-altitude systemFused data / Control commands
From detection to a logged outcome.
The engagement sequence is the same for every target; the response changes with the threat level and the rules of engagement set for the site.
01
Detect
Surveillance radar, RF reconnaissance and EO search watch the approach airspace. A small UAV is detected at up to 5 km.
02
Confirm
The EO tracker is cued to the track. It identifies the target and records video evidence.
03
Assess
The command layer assigns a threat level and recommends a response. The operator confirms, or the preset policy proceeds.
04
Jam
RF jamming is applied at up to 5 km; laser jamming can dazzle the EO payload at up to 2 km.
05
Intercept
If the drone keeps closing, a drone interceptor engages at 3 km or a laser damages the airframe at 1.5 km.
06
Verify
EO confirms landing, return or destruction. The engagement is logged and the air picture returns to search.
What the system is made of.
Four subsystems share one interface standard. Equipment can be added, replaced or moved between positions without rebuilding the command layer.
Command and control
- Intelligent control software
- Human-machine interface
- Computing and storage
- Integrated display
- Communication security
Reconnaissance and detection
- Low-altitude surveillance radar
- EO tracking and identification
- EO search
- Electronic reconnaissance
- Distributed EO detection
Jamming and neutralization
- Directional electronic jammer
- Compact detection-and-jamming unit
- Laser jamming and interception
- Drone-on-drone interception
Supporting infrastructure
- Weather monitoring
- Network and communications
- Power supply and distribution
- Structural mounting
- Lightning and typhoon protection
Collateral effects are engineered, not hoped for.
A counter-UAS system that ignores the site around it is a liability. Every RF and laser effect is bounded before it is authorized.
RF firing table
Frequency windows and directional limits keep jamming away from civil communications and navigation.
Laser firing table
Predicted beam paths, terrain data and no-fire zones bound where a laser can be used.
Debris-fall prediction
EO impact-point modelling visualizes the expected debris zone before a hard kill is authorized.
Human authorization
The human-in-the-loop point is configurable for each step, from automatic jamming to manual hard kill.
System performance.
Figures describe the reference site configuration. Actual performance depends on terrain, weather, sensor placement and the rules of engagement.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Detection above the building line | ≥ 5 km; probability ≥ 92% |
| Detection below the building line | ≥ 2 km; probability ≥ 85% |
| Detection under the canopy | ≥ 400 m; probability ≥ 85% |
| RF jamming | ≥ 5 km (J/S 5:1) |
| Drone-on-drone interception | ≥ 3 km |
| Laser jamming | ≥ 2 km |
| Laser kill | ≥ 1.5 km |
| Overall neutralization probability | ≥ 90% |
| System reaction time | ≤ 5 s |
| Operating temperature | −40 °C to +55 °C |
| Wind | 20 m/s operation; 33 m/s survival |
Start with the site, not the hardware.
Tell us what you are protecting, the approximate perimeter and the threats you are seeing. We will come back with a layered configuration and a deployment sketch.